Template talk:2010 USSF Division 2 Pro League NASL Conference table
The initial order should be the same as on USSF Division 2 Professional League, vis: Carolina, Baltimore, Miami, Montreal, St. Louis, and Vancouver at least until the season starts. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- I must question the logic behind the sequencing as Athletic Club of St. Louis would come first alphabetically... but seeing as how they are all technically tied before the season, it doesn't really matter... just curiosity. Dylant2011 (talk) 06:36, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Feel free to look at the discussion on the league page. I am just following what has been agreed-upon. I believe that you're too close to the subject as a supporter of the club. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, no opposition here. Well keep up the good work. Dylant2011 (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Feel free to look at the discussion on the league page. I am just following what has been agreed-upon. I believe that you're too close to the subject as a supporter of the club. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)